ImportRules

HomeProduct check › Waste or residues brought in for recovery

Which EU rules apply to waste or residues brought in for recovery?

Waste or residues brought into the EU for recovery: which route the waste code decides, and the 2026 and 2027 dates that change it. This page is one fixed set of answers to the product check, written out in full. The wording comes from the same rule set the questionnaire uses, so the two cannot drift apart.

Triage, not a clearance. It sorts this situation into the right regimes; it does not classify your specific product, and classification is where most of the cost sits. Your own case may differ on any of the answers below; run the check with your own.

The answers this rests on

Open the check with these answers →

3 regimes apply to this situation

EPR; extended producer responsibilityif packaging comes with it

If any packaging accompanies these goods; including transport and industrial packaging, which most member states count; you are the producer of that packaging in every country where you first place it on the market. For genuinely unpackaged bulk, check before assuming it applies. There is no EU-wide register: each state has its own scheme, number, fee and report.

  • Packaging triggers it on its own; pallets, drums, wrapping and liners included in most states.
  • You named 1 member state; that many separate registrations, each with its own register, number and fee.
  • Register before the first sale into that country; several states treat selling without a number as an offence.
  • From 12 August 2026, if you make packaging or packaged products available for the first time in another member state directly to end users, you must appoint an authorised representative for extended producer responsibility there, by written mandate and per country. Sell to a distributor established in that country instead and he is the producer there, not you.
  • That first rule already covers you if you sit outside the EU and supply end users directly: Article 3(1), point (15)(c) and (d) says established in a member state or in a third country. Only if you sell to a distributor in that country instead is the mandate a member-state option rather than a duty.
National EPR regimes implementing Directive 2008/98/EC, Article 8a; Regulation (EU) 2025/40 (packaging), Article 45(3) read with Article 3(1), point (15)(c) and (d), and Article 71 (applies from 12 August 2026) · 2025/40 on EUR-Lex · read the full answer

Waste shipments (EVOA / EWSR)route decided by the code

Whether you need prior written notification and consent, or an Annex VII information document, depends on the waste and the destination; not on the quantity. Getting the classification wrong makes the shipment illegal even when every other paper is in order.

  • Notification takes around three months in practice, not thirty days.
  • For green-listed waste the Annex VII information has to be submitted electronically since 21 May 2026, at least two working days before the shipment starts; only the actual quantity, the carrier and the container number may follow later.
  • Paper until the end of 2026 is a tolerated transition, not a right: the Commission proposed in March 2026 and the member states accepted that no penalties follow for paper Annex VII up to 31 December 2026. The legal duty itself started on 21 May 2026, so do not plan on the paper route surviving an inspection abroad.
  • Plastic waste to non-OECD countries is prohibited from 21 November 2026 (Article 39(1)(d)); from 9 November 2026 black mass gets its own hazardous entries in the European List of Waste (19 14 01* to 19 14 07*), which is what closes the route to non-OECD countries for it.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1157, Articles 18, 27(1)(b) and 86(2) for the electronic duty from 21 May 2026, and 39(1)(d); the tolerance to 31 December 2026 is an enforcement arrangement agreed in the waste shipment expert group, not a provision of the regulation; DIWASS technical rules: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1290; black mass: Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2025/934, Article 2 (applies from 9 November 2026) · 2024/1157 on EUR-Lex · 2025/1290 on EUR-Lex · 2025/934 on EUR-Lex · read the full answer

Sanctions screeningscreen before you pay

EU sanctions prohibit making funds or economic resources available to listed persons, directly or indirectly. There is no turnover threshold, a breach does not require intent, and a new or non-EU counterparty is exactly where this bites.

  • Screen the name free on this site before you pay an invoice.
  • Ownership above 50% by a listed person catches a supplier that is not itself listed.
  • Your bank's screening is not your screening, and it is not a defence.
  • If you may have to show later that you checked, keep a dated record naming the list versions.

This is the list of things to check, not a clearance. It leaves out CE, RoHS/WEEE, EUDR, food and cosmetics law and customs. Something wrong or missing? Corrections are made with the source noted.

What to do next, in this order

  1. Check the counterparty exists and who may sign find the company in its home register, free
  2. Screen the name against nine sanctions lists before you pay, not after
  3. Pin down the goods code duty, CBAM scope and restrictions all hang off it
  4. Work out duty and VAT you bring the TARIC rate, the tool does the arithmetic
  5. Verify the VAT number on the day you invoice VIES, and keep the response

Where each of these is worked out

Does this not fit your case, or is something missing? Ask it here; questions are answered with the regulation and the article, and the questionnaire gets fixed. Providers who do this work are listed separately; being named there is not a recommendation.

Other situations, worked out the same way

What this does not cover

Named, because a triage tool that stays quiet about its edges is worse than none: