Sanctions fines: what went wrong, and the lesson

Public enforcement cases, each with its source and the practical lesson for an importer. Not to frighten — to show the pattern: nearly every case traces back to a name that was never screened, a register that was never searched, or a payment that touched a currency nobody thought about. The free screen on this site searches the lists these fines rest on.

These are public enforcement outcomes as reported by the authorities and specialist press. A settlement is not an admission by every party mentioned in reporting; descriptions here stay factual and name only what the public record names.
~$265.7 million
OFAC civil penalties in 2025 (Visual Compliance, 2026 trends)
up to ~$377,700
per civil violation under IEEPA, or twice the transaction value
nearly €615 million
EU member-state fines since February 2022

Individual settles with OFAC for $3.78 million (Syria)

US measures reach non-US persons wherever US dollars, persons, goods or software touch the chain. A dollar payment through a US correspondent bank is enough. Free screen: https://importrules.com/sanctions/
Source: OFAC enforcement actions, 25 February 2026. Checked: 20 September 2026.

UK OFSI fines an investment bank £4.73 million

UK designations do not bind an EU company as law, but EU banks screen against them anyway. The blocked payment and reviewed account arrive before any fine does.
Source: European sanctions enforcement reporting (Duane Morris blog), 2026 (reported). Checked: 20 September 2026.

EU member states together impose nearly €615 million

Over 12,500 investigations across member states. Enforcement is no longer a story about banks; importers and traders are in the scope.
Source: European sanctions enforcement reporting (Duane Morris blog), since February 2022 (running total). Checked: 20 September 2026.

FTI agrees to $1.05 million export-control settlement

Export-control registers (Entity List, Denied Persons, ITAR) bite outside the sanctions freeze lists. Our check searches eleven of those registers alongside the freeze lists.
Source: FD Associates export controls update, June 2026. Checked: 20 September 2026.

German BAFA administrative fines up to €500,000 for negligent breaches

Negligence suffices in Germany. Not screening at all is the most expensive way to save ten minutes; a dated screening record of EUR 29 is the cheapest insurance in this list.
Source: Global Law Experts, Germany sanctions enforcement 2026, 2026 framework. Checked: 20 September 2026.

The pattern behind these fines

Screening failures, not cunning schemes. A counterparty that was listed all along; a register nobody opened; an assumption that EU law stops at the border. Every case on this page would have been visible in a name search against the right lists — which is free here, takes seconds, and leaves a dated record when you need to show you checked.
What to do: run the free screen (no account), keep the dated record (EUR 29) for your file, and watch the name if the relationship continues. Checked: 20 September 2026.
Source: the enforcement pages named per case; totals as published by Visual Compliance (2026 trends) and European enforcement reporting. Checked: 20 September 2026.