Reference IR-PORT-20260904-124212 · screened 04 September 2026, 12:42 UTC · 10 counterparties · prepared by Import Rules for Example Trading BV
2on a list
1linked to a listed party
3to assess
4no match
First screening of this portfolio, so there is nothing to compare against. From the next round on, this section states what changed — which is the part that matters once a portfolio is screened regularly.
What was searched
List
Published by
Listed parties
Recorded spellings
CA
Consolidated Canadian Autonomous Sanctions List
5,690
9,303
CH
Swiss consolidated sanctions list (SECO)
7,108
30,937
EU
EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions List (DG FISMA)
6,234
31,053
OFAC
OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (US)
19,326
43,868
UK
UK Sanctions List (FCDO)
6,334
15,614
UN
UN Security Council Consolidated List
1,011
3,778
List versions as published 04 September 2026. Total 45,703 listed parties across 134,553 recorded spellings.
On a list (2)
Rosneft — 6 matches on CA, CH, OFAC, UK ROSNEFT — UKRAINE-EO13662 ROSNEFT — The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 — Asset freeze|Trust Services Sanctions|Director Disqualification Sanction|Transport sanctions: see 'Other information' Rosneft — Situation in Ukraine — Art. 18 para. 3 let. a (Restrictions on the money and capital markets), annexe 13 Rosneft — Situation in Ukraine — Art. 24a para. 1 let. a (Prohibition on transactions with certain state-owned companies), annexe 15
Sberbank — 8 matches on CA, CH, EU, OFAC, UK Сбербанк — 2022/1270 (OJ L193) Sberbank — The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 — Asset freeze|Trust Services Sanctions|Director Disqualification Sanction|Prohibition on Correspondent banking relationships and processing payments|Prohibition on Correspondent banking relationships and processing payments Sberbank — Situation in Ukraine — Art. 18 para. 1 let. a and e and art. 19 para. 3 let. c (Restrictions on the money and capital markets), annexe 9 Sberbank — Situation in Ukraine — Art. 27 (Banks subject to a transaction ban), annexe 14
Linked to a listed party (1)
These names are on no list themselves. Each is a parent, subsidiary or otherwise connected to a party that is listed. A name search does not surface this, which is why it is the finding most often missed.
What to do with it. Under Regulation (EU) 269/2014 an entity owned for more than 50 percent by a listed party, or under its control, is caught by the same measures. The relationship below is the trigger to establish that percentage — it is not the answer to it. We report the link; the ownership structure is yours to verify.
Rosatom Rosatom — parent company of Federal State Unitary Enterprise Dukhov Automatics Research Institute (UK) rosatom — parent company of NIKIET JSC (UK) Rosatom — parent company of All-Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics (VNIIEF) (UK) Rosatom — parent company of Federal State Unitary Enterprise Zababakhin All-Russia Research Institute of Technical Physics (VNIITF) (UK)
Ownership established — what share, on what evidence?
Assessed by on
To assess (3)
These did not match exactly, but a listed party is spelled close enough that it has to be looked at. Transliteration is how a listed party slips through, so the near miss is shown rather than discarded. The assessment is yours; the box below is deliberately empty.
Your assessment — same party, or a different one? On what basis?
Assessed by on
Meridian Chemicals SA — 1 similar listing Meridian
Your assessment — same party, or a different one? On what basis?
Assessed by on
Northline Shipping AS — 2 similar listings RHINE SHIPPING DMCC OJSC NORTHERN SHIPPING COMPANY
Your assessment — same party, or a different one? On what basis?
Assessed by on
No match on these lists on this date (4)
Listed alphabetically. No match is not a clean bill: it means these names, as spelled, did not appear in the lists above today. Ownership above 50 percent by a listed party is not visible in a name search, and lists change.
Delta Feedstock BV
Hanseatic Bulk Carriers GmbH
Nordwind Trading BV
Vantage Logistics Ltd
What this record is. A dated statement of what was searched, in which list versions, with which spellings, and what came back. It is evidence that a screening was performed and when.
What it is not. It is not a clearance, not legal advice, and not a statement that any party is free of sanctions. Ownership and control above 50 percent, lists outside those named above, and changes after the date shown are outside its scope.